‘Tool port’ to ‘landlord port’: A game theory approach to analyse gains from governance model transformation

Ziaul Haque Munim1[1], Naima Saeed1, Odd I. Larsen2

1School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

2Faculty of Economics, Informatics and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway

Abstract

This study investigates potential port users’ surplus and terminal operators’ profits due to transforming port governance from the ‘tool port’ model to the ‘landlord port’ model. Although the landlord port model is one of the most adopted and successful port governance models, many ports still operate under other models. Chittagong Port, the largest port in Bangladesh, currently operates under the tool port model, while the country’s second-largest port, Mongla Port, operates under the service port model. Chittagong Port is currently facing many challenges, including capacity expansion and renovation of port facilities. Therefore, we form four hypothetical situations for port governance model transformation, assuming that Chittagong Port will transform to the landlord port model but that Mongla Port will run under the existing governance model. Estimating a Bertrand game model, we present a cost-benefit analysis for port users and terminal operators (or port authorities) in hypothetical game situations. The results reveal that privatising one of the container terminals under a landlord setting is the most profitable scenario for Chittagong Port Authority, but privatising all terminals of Chittagong Port yields the highest users’ surplus. However, privatizing two of the terminals while they cooperate yields the lowest users’ surplus.   

Keywords: Bertrand competition, co-operative game, port governance, Chittagong port, two-stage game, competition and cooperation, characteristic function

Cite as: Munim, Z. H., Saeed, N., & Larsen, O. I. (2018). ‘Tool port’ to ‘landlord port’: A game theory approach to analyse gains from governance model transformation. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(1), pp. 43-60, https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1468936

Click here for full version at publisher’s website!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *